Oxford BioMedica
PLC ("BIOMEDICA") Interim Results for the Six Months
Ended 30 June 2002
Half
Year Highlights
- Cash
and liquid resources £26.4 million at 30 June. Cash
reserves sufficient to meet funding requirement to Q3 2004.
- Clinical
success in Phase I/II cancer trials:
-
TroVax®: positive results from all patients.
Phase II trial planning in progress.
-
MetXia®: BC1 trial completed successfully.
BC2 trial in progress. Results suggest broader market
potential.
- New
clinical programmes for USA under way:
-
TroVax®-DC: Phase I/II trial by end of
2002.
-
ProSavin®: Phase I/II trial discussions
with FDA.
- Preclinical
progress & new programmes have extended the product
portfolio beyond cancer:
-
Renurex™ (nerve repair) progress in spinal injury
models. Stroke/wound healing gene target validated.
- New
programmes in Motor Neuron Disease (supported by US
ALS Association); Retinopathy (collaboration with Inst.
of Ophthalmology), Haemophilia (factor VIII), Repoxygen™
(anaemia).
- Good
progress in Wyeth & IDM collaborations. New collaboration
with Arius to generate further tumour antigen opportunities.
- US
subsidiary fully operational.
Commenting
on the Interim Results, Dr Peter Johnson, Chairman of Oxford
BioMedica, said: “Oxford BioMedica has made considerable
progress in the first half of 2002 in advancing its clinical
pipeline and in extending its product portfolio beyond cancer.
We have also built a strong operational base in the USA. We
believe that this has enhanced the Group’s commercial
potential and risk profile. At the same time we have achieved
operational economies that have extended the Group’s
working capital outlook. We look forward to a successful future.”
-Ends-
Return to
the News
Chairman
and Chief Executive’s Report
The
first half of 2002 has brought considerable clinical success
and an improved outlook on cash reserves.
In the
current market conditions one of the most important aspects
of a biotech company is its working capital reserves. The
full-year results for 2001, published in February of this
year, showed that Oxford BioMedica had cash reserves, in the
absence of any income from any source, sufficient to fund
the business until Q4 of 2003. Since then the position has
improved significantly with the current cash being sufficient
to run until Q3 2004. This has been achieved in a number of
ways but without any adverse effect on our key programmes
including the clinical development of MetXia®
and TroVax®.
Firstly
positions that were earmarked to move from Oxford to our San
Diego facility have been moved earlier without a need to have
overlap between the two locations. This has been possible
because of the speed with which the San Diego operation has
got up-and-running and the progress that has been made in
developing the LentiVector® production technology.
As a consequence we have been able to reduce the headcount
in Oxford.
Secondly,
the success achieved in the MetXia® and TroVax®
trials has meant that there is less need to drive the broader
cancer product portfolio as aggressively as anticipated. For
example, both BetOvac® and ProCaStat®
are close to completing their preclinical programmes successfully
and on schedule but their clinical development will now come
second to the development of MetXia® and TroVax®,
unless they become the subject of commercial collaborations
that fund the trials. As a result the clinical development
costs of BetOvac® and ProCaStat®
will be deferred.
Finally,
with the increased focus on our clinical programmes, several
exploratory projects that were some way from clinical or commercial
development have been put on hold.
Despite
these changes the Company has been able to continue its strategic
drive to extend the product portfolio beyond cancer. During
the past few months we have added a candidate product for
motor neuron disease to the neurobiology programme and there
are new programmes in retinopathy, anaemia and haemophilia.
In addition the first product programmes in angiogenesis and
stroke have emerged from our gene discovery activities. The
management team believes that the product portfolio has an
appropriate risk profile and is now a sufficiently strong
platform from which to take the Company towards sustainable
profitability. In the future, our activities will be focused
on the clinical development of these products and commercial
arrangements with late stage development and marketing partners.
Progress in the Clinic
In February
2002 BioMedica presented new data from the MetXia®
and the TroVax® Phase I/II trials that showed
that the condition of some patients in both trials improved
during the trials and that these improvements were correlated
with measurable molecular consequences of administering the
products. Further data from the mid and high dose groups in
the TroVax® trial were reported in July 2002
and they supported the earlier conclusions from the low dose
group. Because the numbers of patients that are permitted
to be included in Phase I/II cancer trials are small these
data cannot be conclusive but they have encouraged us to proceed
with the clinical development of both products. The status
of these products is as follows:
MetXia®:
The BC2 trial using an enhanced form of MetXia®
is in progress. Data will be accumulated during the next few
months. In the first trial, we observed reductions in tumour
size when the tumours were injected with MetXia®.
However, MetXia® also appeared to induce an
anti-tumour immune response in some patients. This was somewhat
surprising although there are reports in the literature of
broadly similar products inducing immune responses. This is
potentially a very important additional benefit because it
means that by injecting one tumour, with MetXia®
a specific immune response may be generated that acts against
other remote tumours in the same patient. This would broaden
the market potential of MetXia® because it
could be used as a systemic therapy rather that just a local
therapy. Therefore, as part of the BC2 study we are monitoring
the immune status of the patients very closely.
TroVax®:
All of the colorectal cancer patients in the Phase I/II study
of TroVax® have now received the full course
of treatment. The last items of data are being analysed and
we are continuing to monitor the mid and high dose groups.
There has been a 100% success rate in TroVax®
inducing an appropriate immune response to the OBA1 tumour
antigen at all dosage levels. There have been no safety issues
at any dose and we have seen some anecdotal clinical benefit
to patients. As a result, TroVax® is on course
for the next phase of clinical testing, the precise protocol
for which will be announced within the next few months. The
simplest trial strategy, that would provide the fastest route
to market would be a trial that positions TroVax®
alongside current chemotherapeutic strategies using 5-fluorouracil
and irinotecan. If successful this could lead to an initial
product registration for a market of $0.5-1.0 billion.
First Trials in the USA
A prime
reason for establishing an operating facility in the USA was
to establish a close working relationship with the FDA and
with major clinical centres in the world’s largest pharmaceutical
market. This is already bearing fruit.
We had
a very successful formal pre-IND meeting with the FDA to discuss
the trial of TroVax® administered directly
to a patient’s dendritic cells (TroVax®-DC)
at the Arizona Cancer Center. Dendritic cells can be extracted
from the patient’s blood and then primed with TroVax®-DC
to stimulate them to produce antibodies to the tumour when
re-introduced to the patient. There are only minor regulatory
issues to address before the trial commences later this year.
TroVax®-DC is designed to enhance a patient’s
immune response to the OBA1 tumour antigen particularly in
those cancer patients whose immune systems are compromised
by chemotherapy or radiotherapy. This product strategy is
part of BioMedica’s collaboration with IDM of Paris.
In a second,
informal meeting with the FDA, ProSavin®, the
Company’s Parkinson’s disease (PD) product was
reviewed. This was an important meeting because it was the
first time that one of the Company’s LentiVector®
products had been presented to the FDA. BioMedica presented
the product composition, an outline clinical protocol and
a manufacturing process, all pioneered by the Company. The
meeting was extremely successful in that no major issues were
raised. The directors are optimistic, therefore, that, subject
to full and formal approval by the FDA and further preclinical
testing, ProSavin® is on course for a Phase
I/II study in late stage PD patients. We are in discussion
with clinical centres in the USA to conduct the trial.
Preclinical Progress and New Candidate Products
From its
broad technology base, BioMedica has concluded a number of
exploratory research programmes over the past six months and
brought several new products into preclinical development.
It is not the Company’s intention to progress all of
these into the clinic without a partner but to establish strong
preclinical proofs of principle as drivers for commercial
collaborations. The new candidate products are for the following
conditions: motor neuron disease (market potential $100 million);
diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration,
the most common causes of blindness in the developed world
(market potential $3 billion); haemophilia (market potential
$2.4 billion); anaemia (market potential $1 billion). The
motor neuron disease programme has already been the subject
of a grant from the American ALS Association.
Established
preclinical programmes are going to plan. The development
of ProSavin® has moved entirely to San Diego
where the final phase of preclinical studies is being carried
out. RenurexTM, the nerve repair product, has shown
excellent results in vitro and is now being evaluated in industry-standard
models for spinal injury. ImmStat®, the AIDS
product, is under evaluation by a potential partner.
Research
The Company
is now focusing on only two areas of research. These are in
tumour antigens and antibodies, and selected output from our
gene discovery activity.
BioMedica
announced in July 2002 its collaboration with Arius Research
Inc. whereby BioMedica would gain access to a pipeline of
anti-tumour antibodies. BioMedica and Arius will then seek
to identify cognate antigens and develop products based on
these molecules. The programme makes use of BioMedica’s
leading technology in tumour immunology and is designed to
exploit the expanding appetite in the pharmaceutical industry
for anti-tumour antibodies and immunotherapies. It has been
estimated that the therapeutic antibody market alone will
have grown to $4 billion by the end of this year and is set
to rise steadily over the next 10 years.
The Company’s
gene discovery activities have yielded a validated target
for a small molecule drug development programme in the field
of angiogenesis. Potential products against this target could
be used in wound healing (market potential >$100 million),
stroke (market potential $400 million) and cardiovascular
disease (market potential >$1 billion). The Company is
seeking a chemistry partner for this programme.
Collaborations
Oxford
BioMedica’s major collaboration with Wyeth in the field
of immunotoxins is proceeding according to plan with Wyeth
having made a continuation payment to the Company early in
the year. Further preclinical data are expected later this
year.
The Company’s
collaborations with Virbac S.A. for the veterinary form of
TroVax® and with Amersham for tumour imaging
have made progress during the last six months. The TroVax®
programme has been granted Eureka status under the EC Eureka
grant scheme and this may lead to substantial funding for
this programme from government sources. The cardiovascular
collaboration with Aventis/Gencell remains in place.
The slow
down in commercial activity in the pharmaceutical industry
seen towards the end of last year now show signs of abating,
and the Company is in discussions with a number of potential
partners. The commercial climate remains challenging, however.
Patents
The intellectual
property portfolio continues to underpin the Company’s
fundamental value. Nine new filings were made in the first
six months of this year and seven patents were granted.
Financial
The Group
has continued to manage its finances prudently, and the net
loss for the period was within budget. Having regard to the
general economic climate, the state of the equity markets
and the level of the Group’s income, we have slowed
the expansion that we started in 2001. We are continuing the
strategic investment in our San Diego, USA subsidiary, but
as described above, we have cut back some programmes at Oxford,
and have accelerated the transfer of others to San Diego.
Revenue
of £172,000 in the first half of 2002 arose from the
Group’s immunotoxin collaboration with Wyeth. By comparison,
in the first half of 2001, in addition to revenue from Wyeth,
the Group had revenue from collaborations with Aventis, Modex
(this collaboration ended in October 2001), Virbac, and Amersham.
Operating
expenses for the first half of 2002 were £6.7 million,
of which £1.2 million was in the USA. Overall, operating
expenses were 34% higher than the first half of 2001 as a
result of planned expansion. However, compared to the second
half of 2001, when operating expenses were £6.4 million
(UK costs £5.7 million, USA costs £0.7 million),
total Group operating expenses were just 4% higher, and UK
operating costs were 3% lower as a result of cost containment
measures. Group research and development costs were £5.1
million (first half 2001: £3.8 million, full year 2002:
£8.6 million).
An increasing
part of the Group’s activity is now based in the USA.
The Group headcount at June 2002 was 81, of which 63 were
in the UK and 18 were in the USA. As a result of the cost
containment measures at Oxford, the UK headcount was lower
in June 2002 than in either June 2001 (UK headcount: 67) or
December 2001 (UK headcount: 79).
Interest
receivable on cash deposits was £0.6 million in the
first half of 2002, the same amount as in the first half of
2001 (full year 2001 was £1.5 million). This reflects
cash balances that were at their peak following the share
issue in April 2001, coupled with falling interest rates,
in both the UK and the USA.
The tax
credit for the first half of 2002 of £0.6 million (first
half 2001: £0.4 million, full year 2001: £1.2
million) in the profit and loss account is the amount receivable
under the UK R&D tax credit, net of tax payable in the
USA. The Group received a tax credit payment of £0.4
million in the first half of 2002.
As a consequence
of the above, the loss after tax for the first half of 2002
was £5.3 million (30 June 2001: £3.6 million,
31 December 2001: £8.4 million).
Capital
expenditure of £0.9 million (first half 2001: £1.5
million, full year 2001: £3.2 million) related mainly
to equipping the US subsidiary’s new facilities.
The bank
balance at 30 June 2002 was £26.4 million (30 June 2001:
£39.9 million, 31 December 2001: £32.6 million).
The net cash outflow before management of liquid resources
and financing (the ‘cash burn’) was £6.2
million for the first half of 2002. This is a reduction of
£1.1 million compared to the second half of 2001, attributable
principally to lower capital expenditure. The issue of shares
on exercise of employee share options in 2002 raised £0.1
million.
We estimate
that the cash position at 30 June 2002 taken with the reduction
in planned expenditure described above has extended the Group’s
cash reserves by over six months. On a worst-case view, that
the Group has no further income or new funding from any source,
current cash resources are sufficient to fund the business
until Q3 2004.
Changes to the Board
On 1 May
2002 Peter Nolan replaced Dr Paul Durrands as Senior Vice
President for Commercial Development. Peter has been a senior
member of the Company since its foundation, and is a director
of the UK BioIndustry Association. Prior to joining BioMedica,
he was head of the Biotechnology Unit at the UK Department
of Trade & Industry. He has overall responsibility for
the Company’s patent portfolio, strategic in-licensing
and technology acquisition activities, and analysis of merger
and acquisition opportunities. Paul Durrands resigned from
the Board in order to pursue other opportunities in the biotech
sector, and we wish him well in his new ventures and we thank
him for his contributions to the Company.
Conclusion
Over the
past six months the Company has added to the therapeutic focus
of its product pipeline and met its commitment to extend the
product portfolio beyond cancer to widen the potential for
commercial deals. This is an important strategic move as we
believe that many of the non-cancer products should be easier
to partner than cancer products. The emphasis of the Company
has made a natural progression towards product development,
with only a small fraction of the overall resource now being
spent on product research. In the coming months we will use
the strength of our product pipeline to bring additional revenue
into BioMedica.
We are
optimistic for the long term. The Company is in a strong cash
position and our focus on the development of the clinical
pipeline means we are poised for ongoing commercial growth.
We would
like to thank our loyal and hard working staff for their dedication
to the Group and our shareholders for their continued support
in these difficult times.
Dr
Peter Johnson
Chairman |
Professor
Alan Kingsman
Chief Executive Officer |
Consolidated
profit and loss account
for the six months ended 30 June 2002
| |
Notes |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2002
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2001
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Year
ended
31 December
2001
(audited)
£’000 |
| Turnover |
2 |
|
|
|
| Research
and development costs |
|
(5,088) |
(3,755) |
(8,570) |
| Administrative
expenses |
|
(1,619)
|
(1,236)
|
(2,859)
|
| Operating
expenses |
|
(6,707) |
(4,991) |
(11,429) |
| Other
operating income: government grants receivable |
|
19
|
14
|
29
|
| Net
operating expenses |
|
(6,688)
|
(4,977)
|
(11,400)
|
| Operating
loss |
|
(6,516) |
(4,630) |
(11,027) |
| Interest
receivable |
|
612
|
610
|
1,486
|
| Loss
on ordinary activities before taxation |
2 |
(5,904) |
(4,020) |
(9,541) |
| Tax
credit on loss on ordinary activities |
|
614 |
435 |
1,152 |
| Loss
for the period |
|
(5,290)
|
(3,585)
|
(8,389)
|
| Basic
loss and diluted loss per ordinary share |
3 |
(2.2p) |
(1.8p) |
(3.8p) |
The results
for the periods above are derived entirely from continuing
operations.
There
is no difference between the loss on ordinary activities before
taxation and the loss for the periods stated above, and their
historical cost equivalents.
Statement
of group total recognised gains and losses
| |
Notes |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2002
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2001
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Year
ended
31 December
2001
(audited)
£’000 |
| Loss
for the financial period |
|
(5,290)
|
(3,585)
|
(8,389)
|
| Currency
translation differences on foreign currency net investments |
7 |
(150)
|
-
|
(2)
|
| Total
recognised losses for the period |
|
(5,440)
|
(3,585)
|
(8,391)
|
Consolidated
balance sheet
at
30 June 2002
| |
Notes |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2002
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2001
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Year
ended
31 December
2001
(audited)
£’000 |
| Fixed
assets |
|
|
|
|
| Intangible
assets |
|
209 |
258 |
234 |
| Tangible
assets |
4 |
3,936 |
2,445 |
3,647 |
| Investments |
|
26 |
26 |
26 |
| |
|
4,171
|
2,729
|
3,907
|
| Current
assets |
|
|
|
|
| Debtors |
5 |
3,069 |
1,622 |
2,712 |
| Cash
at bank and in hand |
|
26,446 |
39,853 |
32,645 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
29,515 |
41,475 |
35,357 |
| Creditors:
amounts falling due within one year |
6 |
(1,539) |
(2,059) |
(1,756) |
| Net
current assets |
|
27,976
|
39,416
|
33,601
|
| Net
assets |
|
32,147
|
42,145
|
37,508
|
| Capital
and reserves |
|
|
|
|
| Called-up
share capital |
|
2,388 |
2,374 |
2,382 |
| Share
premium account |
|
58,762 |
58,528 |
58,689 |
| Other
reserve |
|
711 |
711 |
711 |
| Profit
and loss account (deficit) |
|
(29,714) |
(19,468) |
(24,274) |
| Equity
shareholders' funds |
7 |
32,147
|
42,145
|
37,508
|
Consolidated
cash flow statement
for the six month ended 30 June 2002
| |
Notes |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2002
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2001
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Year
ended
31 December
2001
(audited)
£’000 |
| Operating
activities |
|
|
|
|
| Net
cash outflow from continuing operating activities |
a |
|
|
|
| Returns
on investments and servicing of finance |
|
|
|
|
| Interest
received |
|
772
|
520
|
1,120
|
| Taxation
|
|
|
|
|
| Tax
credit received |
|
394 |
- |
- |
| Overseas
tax paid |
|
- |
- |
(2) |
| |
|
394
|
-
|
(2)
|
| Capital
expenditure |
|
|
|
|
| Purchase
of tangible fixed assets |
|
(855)
|
(1,151)
|
(3,182)
|
| Net
cash outflow before management of liquid resources and
financing |
|
(6,202)
|
(4,600)
|
(11,910)
|
| Management
of liquid resources |
|
|
|
|
| Transfer
to deposit accounts |
|
(6) |
(43,282) |
(32,190) |
| Transfer
to current accounts |
|
6,984 |
14,679 |
10,886 |
| |
|
6,978
|
(28,603)
|
(21,304)
|
| Financing |
|
|
|
|
| Issue
of ordinary shares |
|
79 |
35,909 |
36,108 |
| Expenses
of share issue |
|
- |
(3,091) |
(3,186) |
| Net
cash inflow from financing |
|
79
|
32,818
|
32,922
|
| Increase/(decrease)
in cash in the period |
b |
855
|
(385)
|
(292) |
Notes
to the consolidated cash flow statement
for the six months ended 30 June 2002
| (a)
Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash outflow from
operating activities |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2002
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2001
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Year
ended
31 December
2001
(audited)
£’000 |
| Continuing
activities |
|
|
|
| Operating
loss |
(6,516) |
(4,630) |
(11,027) |
| Amortisation
of intangible fixed assets |
25 |
25 |
49 |
| Depreciation
of tangible fixed assets |
577 |
318 |
840 |
| Loss
on disposal of fixed assets |
- |
1 |
1 |
| (Increase)/decrease
in debtors due after more than one year |
(330) |
37 |
37 |
| Decrease/(increase)
in other debtors and other tax receivable |
34 |
(5) |
16 |
| Increase
in prepayments and accrued income |
(2) |
(60) |
(163) |
| (Decrease)/increase
in trade creditors |
(210) |
146 |
216 |
| (Decrease)/increase
in other taxation and social security |
(85) |
(30) |
58 |
| Increase
in accruals and deferred income |
2 |
229 |
127 |
| Exchange
rate differences |
(8) |
- |
- |
| Net
cash outflow from continuing operating activities |
(6,513)
|
(3,969)
|
(9,846)
|
| (b)
Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net funds |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2002
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Six
months
ended
30 June 2001
(unaudited)
£’000 |
Year
ended
31 December
2001
(audited)
£’000 |
| Net
funds at 1 January |
32,645 |
11,635 |
11,635 |
| Movement
on deposit accounts |
(6,978) |
28,603 |
21,304 |
| Increase/(decrease)
in cash in the period |
855 |
(385) |
(292) |
| Exchange
movements |
(76) |
- |
(2) |
| Net
funds at 30 June/31 December |
26,446
|
39,853
|
32,645
|
| (c)
Analysis of net funds |
At
1 January
2002
£’000 |
Cash
flow
£’000 |
Exchange
movements
£’000 |
At
30 June
2002
£’000 |
| Cash |
249 |
855 |
(76) |
1,028 |
| Liquid
resources |
32,396 |
(6,978) |
- |
25,418 |
| Net
funds/cash at bank and in hand |
32,645
|
| |